The Impact of Wikis and Discussion Boards on Learning English as a Second LanguageA Mixed Methods Research
- Mª Cruz Sánchez-Gómez 1
- Ana María Pinto-Llorente 1
- Francisco José García-Peñalvo 1
-
1
Universidad de Salamanca
info
ISSN: 2013-9144
Année de publication: 2017
Número: 32
Pages: 35-59
Type: Article
D'autres publications dans: Digital Education Review
Résumé
n the field of teaching a second language (L2), technology has always occupied a relevant position. The development of new technological tools has allowed the convergence of two learning environments, traditional face-to-face learning and virtual learning. This convergence has fostered the advantages of both types of instructions and the possibilities to learn a L2. In this study, researchers tried to explore pre-service teachers’ perspectives towards the use of wikis and discussion boards to improve writing skills in English and promote autonomous and collaborative learning in a B-learning environment. 358 pre-service teachers participated in the study in which a mixed methods research approach was adopted to integrate results and have a broader vision of the phenomenon. The results suggested pre-service teachers’ positive perception of the e-activities developed to improve the quality of their English, feeling more confidence in that language. They highlighted the opportunities afforded by wikis to create collective texts based on their agreements and individual contributions that promoted individual and cooperative learning, and by discussion boards to communicate, solve problems, get consensus or support a dynamic process. The fact of using a mixed methods research approach enhanced the validity and reliability of data, and added rigor to the study.
Références bibliographiques
- Anguera, M.T. (2008). Metodologías cualitativas: características, procesos y aplicaciones. In M. A. Verdugo et al. (Coords.), Metodología en la investigación sobre discapacidad. Introducción al uso de las ecuaciones estructurales (pp.141-155). Salamanca: Publicaciones del INICO.
- Arnold, N., Ducate, L. & Kost, C. (2012). Collaboration or Cooperation? Analyzing Group Dynamics and Revision Processes in Wikis. CALICO Journal, 29, 431-448.
- Arteaga, R., & Duarte, A. (2010). Motivational factors that influence the acceptance of Moodle using TAM. Computers in Human Behaviour, 26, 1632-1640.
- Attride-Stirling, J. (2001). Thematic networks: An analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 1, 385-405.
- Aydin, S. (2014). Wikis as a Tool for Collaborative Learning: Implications for Literacy, Language Education and Multilingualism. Sustainable Multilingualism, 5, 207-236.
- Aydin, Z., & Yildiz, S. (2014). Using wikis to promote collaborative EFL writing. Language Learning & Technology 18(1), 160–180.
- Bryman, A. (2008). Quality criteria for quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods research: A view from social policy. International Journal Social Research Methodology, 11, 261-276.
- Cea-D’ancona, M. A. (1998). Metodología cuantitativa: estrategias y técnicas de investigación social. Madrid: Síntesis.
- Coaten, N. (2003). Blended e-learning. Educaweb, 69. Retrieved from http://www.educaweb.com/esp/servicios/monografico/formacionvirtual/1181076-a.html
- Delgado, C. (2014). Viajando a Ítaca por los mares cuantitativos, manual de ruta para investigar en grado y en postgrado. Salamanca: Amarú Ediciones.
- Farabaugh, R. (2007). The isle is full of noises: Using Wiki software to establish a discourse community in a Shakespeare classroom. Language Awareness, 16, 41-56.
- Ferriman, N. (2013). The impact of blended e-learning on undergraduate academic essay writing in English (L2). Computers & Education, 60, 243-253.
- Fitze, M. (2006). Discourse and Participation in ESL face-to-face and written electronic conferences. Language Learning & Technology, 10, 67-86.
- Franco, C. P. (2008). Using Wiki-based Peer-Correction to Develop Writing Skills of Brazilian EFL Learners. Novitas-ROYAL, 2, 49-59.
- García, F.J. & García, J. (2005). Educational Hypermedia Resources Facilitator. Computers & Education, 44(3), 301-325.
- García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2008). Advances in E-Learning: Experiences and Methodologies. Hershey, PA: Information Science Reference.
- Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: Aldine Publishing Company.
- Graham, C. R. (2006). Blended Learning Systems. Definition, Current Trends, and Future Directions. In C. R. Graham & C. J. Bonk (Eds), The Handbook of Blended Learning. Global Perspectives, Local Design (pp. 3-21). San Francisco: Eds. Pfeiffer.
- Güzer, B., & Caner, H. (2014). The Past, Present and Future of Blended Learning: An in Depth Analysis of Literature. Procedia. Social and Behavioral Sciences. 116, 4596-4603.
- Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista, P. (2014). Metodología de la investigación. México: McGraw Hill.
- Kessler, G., & Bikowski, D. (2010). Developing Collaborative Autonomous Learning Abilities in Computer Mediated Language Learning: Attention to Meaning among Students in wiki space. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 23, 41-58.
- Kol, S., & Schcolnik, M. (2008). Asynchronous Forums in EAP: Assessment Issues. Language Learning & Technology, 12, 49-70.
- Kovacic, A., Bubas, G., & Zlatovic, M. (2008). E-tivities with a wiki: Innovative Teaching of English as a Foreign Language. Retrieved from http://bib.irb.hr/datoteka/362544.EUNIS-2008_Award-submissionpaper_KovacicBubasZlatovic.pdf.
- Lado, R. (2000). Language Testing: Writing in a Foreign Language. London: Longman. López, C. & Matesanz, M. (2009). Las plataformas de aprendizaje. Del mito a la realidad. Madrid: Editorial Biblioteca Nueva.
- Lund, A. (2008). Wikis: a Collective Approach to Language Learning. ReCALL, 20(1), 35-54.
- Mak, B., & Coniam, D. (2008). Using Wikis to enhance and develop writing skills among secondary school students in Hong Kong. System. An International Journal of Educational Technology and Applied Linguistics, 36, 437-455.
- Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded Sourcebook. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
- Miyazoe, T., & Anderson, T. (2010). Learning Outcomes and Students’ Perceptions of Online Writing: Simultaneous Implementation of a Forum, Blog, and Wiki in an EFL Blended Learning Setting. System. 38(2), 185-199.
- Nielsen, B. (2013). Students’ Perceptions and Learning Outcomes of Online Writing Using Discussion Boards. The Jaltcalljornal 9, 131-147.
- Nunan, D. (1989). Designing Tasks for the Communicative Classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Osguthorpe, R.T., & Graham, C.R. (2003). Blended Learning Environments: Definitions and Directions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 4(3), 227-233.
- Pinto-Llorente, A. M., Sánchez-Gómez, M. C., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2014). Assessing the effectiveness of a technological model to improve written skills in English in higher education. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 6974). New York: ACM.
- Pinto, A. M., Sánchez, M. C., & García, F. J. (2015a). Developing a VLE to Enable the Innovative Learning of English Pronunciation. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 83-89). New York: ACM.
- Pinto-Llorente, A. M., Sánchez-Gómez, M. C., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2015b). To Be or Not to Be Successful? That Does Not Only Depend on Technology, But Also on Human Factors. Journal of Cases on Information Technology, 17, 51-69.
- Pinto-Llorente, A. M., Sánchez-Gómez, M. C., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2016). Assessing the Effectiveness of Interactive and Collaborative Resources to Improve Reading and Writing in English. International Journal of Human Capital and Information Technology Professionals (IJHCITP), 7(1), 66-85.
- Pinto-Llorente, A. M., et al. (2017a). Students’ Perceptions and Attitudes Towards Asynchronous Technological Tools in Blended-Learning Training to Improve Grammatical Competence in English as a Second Language. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 632-643.
- Pinto-Llorente, A. M. Sánchez-Gómez, M. C., & García-Peñalvo, F. J. (2017b). A Mixed Methods Research of Pre-service Teachers’ Perceptions about the Benefits of Wiki-Based Tasks and Discussion Boards. In A. P. Costa et al. (Eds.), Computer Supported Qualitative Research, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing (pp. 260-276). Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
- Pressley, M. (2000). What should Comprehension Instruction Be the Instruction of? In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson and R. Barr. (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 545-561). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- Sánchez-Gómez, M. C. (2015). La dicotomía cualitativo-cuantitativo: posibilidades de integración y diseños mixtos. Campo Abierto, Vol. monográfico, pp. 11-30.
- Savignon, S.J., & Roithmeier, W. (2004). Computer-Mediated Communication: Texts and Strategies. CALICO Journal, 21(2), 265-290.
- Schellens, T., Van Keer, H., De Wever, B., & Valcke, M. (2007). Scripting by Assigning Roles: Does it Improve Knowledge Construction in Asynchronous Discussion Groups? International Journal of ComputerSupported Collaborative Learning, 2, 225-246.
- Thorne, K. (2003). Blended Learning: How to Integrate Online and Traditional Learning. London: Kogan.
- Twu, H. (2010). A predictive study of Wiki interaction: Can attitude toward Wiki predict Wiki interaction in High Context Cultures groups? Journal of Educational Technology Development and Exchange, 3, 57-68.
- Usó, E., & Martínez, A. (2006). Current Trends in the Development and Teaching of the Four Language Skills. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
- Wichadee, S. (2013). Improving Students’ Summary Writing Ability through and Conventional Face-to-Face Group. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 12, 107-116.
- Woolley, G. (2011). Reading Comprehension: Assisting Children with Learning Difficulties. New York: Springer.
- López, C. & Matesanz, M. (2009). Las plataformas de aprendizaje. Del mito a la realidad. Madrid: Editorial Biblioteca Nueva.