Assessment of Information Literacy and Its Relationship With Learning Outcomes

  1. Martínez-Abad, Fernando 1
  2. Torrijos-Fincias, Patricia 1
  3. Gamazo, Adriana 1
  4. Conde, María José Rodríguez 1
  1. 1 University of Salamanca, Spain
Book:
Global Implications of Emerging Technology Trends
  1. Francisco José García-Peñalvo (coord.)

ISSN: 1935-3391 1935-3405

ISBN: 9781522549444

Year of publication: 2018

Pages: 1-18

Type: Book chapter

DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-4944-4.CH001 GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen access editor

Sustainable development goals

Abstract

The global integration of competence-based education and training systems and the search for a generalized common framework for the incorporation of key competences in the curriculums of national education systems have generated a growing need for information literacy as a way of advancing to the awaited knowledge society. Large-scale assessments of student performance present criterion variables such as language, mathematics, or science, but it is noticeable how these assessments leave aside contents from other key competences such as information literacy. This chapter shows a theoretical approach to the subject and an example of an empirical study that aims to shed some light to the topic of information literacy by analysing the relationship between the level of information literacy shown by a student and their academic performance in subjects such as language and mathematics. The results suggest that it is possible to develop an instrument for the assessment of the complex information literacy competence, and which is also easy to administer in the classroom.

Bibliographic References

  • ALA/ACRL . (2000). Information literacy competency standards for higher education. Chicago, IL: ACRL.
  • American Library Association . (1989). American Library Association Presidential Committee on Information Literacy: final report. Chicago: American Library Association.
  • Andretta S. (2007). Phenomenography: A conceptual framework for information literacy education.Aslib Proceedings, 59(2), 152–168. 10.1108/00012530710736663
  • Area Moreira M. (2001). Educar en la sociedad de la información. Bilbao: Desclée De Brouwer.
  • Area Moreira M. (2010). ¿Por qué formar en competencias informacionales y digitales en la educación superior?Revista de Universidad y Sociedad del Conocimiento, 7(2), 2–5.
  • Bawden D. (2001). Information and digital literacies: A review of concepts.The Journal of Documentation, 57(2), 218–259. 10.1108/EUM0000000007083
  • Bielba Calvo M. Martínez-Abad F. Herrera García M. E. (2014). Selection of key standards to create an instrument for information literacy assessment in Compulsory Secondary Education. In Proceedings TEEM’ 14. Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 475-482). Salamanca: ACM.
  • Bielba Calvo M. Martínez Abad F. Herrera García M. E. Rodríguez Conde M. J. (2015). Diseño de un instrumento de evaluación de competencias informacionales en educación secundaria obligatoria a través de la selección de indicadores clave.Education in the Knowledge Society, 16(3), 124–143. 10.14201/eks2015163124143
  • Bielba Calvo, M., Martínez Abad, F., & Rodríguez Conde, M. J. (En prensa). Validación psicométrica de un instrumento de evaluación de competencias informacionales en la educación secundaria. Bordón. Revista de pedagogía.
  • Bruce C. (1997). The seven faces of information literacy. Adelaide: Auslib Press.
  • Bundy, A. (1998). Information literacy: the key competency for the 21sr century. In Annual Conference of the International Association of Technological University Libraries (p. 16). Pretoria, South Africa: Academic Press.
  • Bundy, A., & Anziil. (2004). Australian and New Zealand information literacy framework principles, standards and practice. Australian and New Zealand Institute for Information Literacy. Retrieved from http://www.anziil.org/resources/Info%20lit%202nd%20edition.pdf
  • Byrne A. (2005). La alfabetización informacional desde una perspectiva global: Eldesastre agudiza nuestras mentes.Anales de Documentación, 8, 7–20.
  • Cassity E. Ang I. (2006). Industry partnerships and the «Knowledge Society»: The australian experience.Minerva, 44(1), 47–63. 10.1007/s11024-005-5412-9
  • Castells M. (1999). The information age: economy, society and culture. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
  • Catts R. Lau J. (2009). Hacia unos indicadores de alfabetización informacional. Madrid: Ministerio de Cultura.
  • CAUL . (2001). Information literacy standards. Canberra: University of South Australia.
  • Cebrián Herreros M. (2009). La sociedad de la informacion y del conocimiento en los paises nordicos. Barcelona: Gedisa.
  • Cerezo, J. M. (2008). Hacia un nuevo paradigma: la era de la información fragmentada. Revista Telos, (76). Retrieved from http://sociedadinformacion.fundacion.telefonica.com/telos/articulocuaderno.a sp@idarticulo=6&rev=76.htm
  • Cervini R. Dari N. Quiroz S. (2014). Estructura familiar y rendimiento académico en países de América Latina: Los datos del Segundo Estudio Regional Comparativo y Explicativo. rmie. Revista Mexicana de Investigación Educativa, 19(61), 569–597.
  • Coleman J. S. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity (Vol. 2). Washington, DC: US Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Office of Education.
  • Cope B. Kalantzis M. (2009). Multiliteracies: New literacies, new learning.Pedagogies, 4(3), 164–195. 10.1080/15544800903076044
  • CRUE-TIC & REBIUN. (2009). Competencias informáticas e informacionales en los estudios de grado. Retrieved from http://crue-tic.uji.es/index.php?option=com_remository&Itemid=28&func=startdown&id=226
  • De la Orden A. Jornet J. M. (2012). La utilidad de las evaluaciones de sistemas educativos: El valor de la consideración del contexto.Bordón, 64(2), 69–88.
  • De Witte K. Kortelainen M. (2013). What explains the performance of students in a heterogeneous environment? Conditional efficiency estimation with continuous and discrete environmental variables.Applied Economics, 45(17), 2401–2412. 10.1080/00036846.2012.665602
  • Delors J. (1996). Learning, the treasure within: report to UNESCO of the International Commission on Education for the Twenty-first Century. Paris: UNESCO.
  • Diehm R.-A. Lupton M. (2012). Approaches to learning information literacy: A phenomenographic study.Journal of Academic Librarianship, 38(4), 217–225. 10.1016/j.acalib.2012.05.003
  • Ferrari A. (2013). DIGCOMP: a framework for developing and understanding digital competence in Europe (PunieY.BrečkoB. N., Eds.). Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  • Freire P. (1981). Literacy and revolution. New York: Continuum.
  • Freire P. Macedo D. P. (1987). Literacy: reading the word & the world. South Hadley, MA: Bergin & Garvey Publishers.
  • Gamazo A. Olmos-Migueláñez S. Martínez-Abad F. (2016, November). Multilevel models for the assessment of school effectiveness using PISA scores. In Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Technological Ecosystems for Enhancing Multiculturality (pp. 1161-1166). ACM.10.1145/3012430.3012663
  • García-Peñalvo F. J. (2014). Managing the Knowledge Society Construction.International Journal of Knowledge Management, 10(4), iv–vii.
  • García-Peñalvo F. J. (2015). Information Technology Research.Journal of Information Technology Research, 8(1), iv–v.
  • García-Peñalvo F. J. (2016). Digital Humanities Data Processing.Journal of Information Technology Research, 9(1), v–viii.
  • García-Peñalvo F. J. (2017). Multidisciplinary and interdisciplinary approaches in information technology research.Journal of Information Technology Research, 10(1), vi–viii.
  • García-Valcárcel Muñoz-Repiso A. Mena Marcos J. J. (2016). Information Technology As a Way To Support Collaborative Learning: What In-service Teachers Think, Know and Do.Journal of Information Technology Research, 9(1), 1–17. 10.4018/JITR.2016010101
  • González Barberá, C., Caso Niebla, J., Díaz López, K., & López Ortega, M. (2012). Rendimiento académico y factores asociados: aportaciones de algunas evaluaciones a gran escala. Bordón. Revista de pedagogía, 64(2), 51-68.
  • Grizzle, A., Wilson, C., & UNESCO. (2011). Media and information literacy curriculum for teachers. Paris: UNESCO. Retrieved from http://www.unesco.org/new/fileadmin/MULTIMEDIA/HQ/CICI/pdfpublicationsMedia%20and%20information%20literacy%20curriculum%20for%20teachers.pdf
  • Gutierrez A. Tiner K. (2012). Educación para los medios, alfabetizaciónmediática y competencia digital.Comunicar, 38(9), 31–39.
  • Halász G. Michel A. (2011). Key Competences in Europe: Interpretation, policy formulation and implementation.European Journal of Education, 46(3), 289–306. 10.1111/j.1465-3435.2011.01491.x
  • Hernández-Ramos J. P. Martínez-Abad F. García-Peñalvo F. J. Herrera García M. E. Rodríguez-Conde M. J. (2014). Teachers’ attitude regarding the use of ICT. A factor reliability and validity study.Computers in Human Behavior, 31, 509–516. 10.1016/j.chb.2013.04.039
  • Instituto Nacional de Tecnologías Educativas y de Formación del Profesorado (INTEF). (2017). Marco Común de Competencia Digital Docente. Author.
  • Jarson, J., & Taub-Pervizpour, L. (2015). Infoglut or Information Literacy? Using Blended Learning for Student Research in «New Information Technologies». Blended Learning in the Liberal Arts Conference. Retrieved from http://repository.brynmawr.edu/blended_learning/2015/2015/3
  • Kerlinger, F., & Lee, H. (1999). Foundations of behavioral research (4th ed.). Wadsworth Publishing.
  • Lankshear C. Knobel A. (2008). Nuevos alfabetismos su práctica cotidiana y el aprendizaje en el aula. Madrid: Morata.
  • Lee J. Shute V. J. (2010). Personal and Social-Contextual Factors in K-12 Academic Performance: An Integrative Perspective on Student Learning.Educational Psychologist, 45(3), 185–202. 10.1080/00461520.2010.493471
  • Levitin D. J. (2014). The Organized Mind: Thinking Straight in the Age of Information Overload. Penguin.
  • Martínez Abad F. Olmos Migueláñez S. Rodríguez Conde M. J. (2015). Evaluación de un programa de formación en competencias informacionales para el futuro profesorado de E.S.O.Review of Education, (370): 45–70.
  • Martínez-Abad F. Torrijos-Fincias P. Rodríguez-Conde M. J. (2016). The eAssesment of key competences and their relationship performance.Journal of Information Technology Research, 9(4), 16–27. doi:10.4018/JITR.2016100102
  • Mullis, I. V., Martin, M. O., Kennedy, A. M., Trong, K. L., & Sainsbury, M. (2009). PIRLS 2011 Assessment Framework. International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement. Retrieved from http://www.iea.nl
  • Murillo F. J. (2003). El movimiento de investigación de Eficacia Escolar. In La investigación sobre Eficacia Escolar en Iberoamérica. Revisión internacional del estado del arte. Bogotá: Convenio Andrés Bello.
  • Murillo F. J. (2005). La Investigación sobre Eficacia Escolar. Barcelona: Octaedro.
  • Nath S. R. (2012). Factors Influencing Primary Students’ Learning Achievement in Bangladesh.Research in Education, 88(1), 50–63. 10.7227/RIE.88.1.5
  • O’Farrill R. (2008). Information Literacy and knowledge management: Preparations for an arranged marriage.Libri, 58(3), 155–171. 10.1515/libr.2008.017
  • OECD. (2012). PISA 2009 technical report. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://proxy.library.carleton.ca/login?url=http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264167872-en
  • OECD. (2017). PISA: Programme for International Student Assessment, OECD Education Statistics (database). DOI: 10.1787/data-00365-en
  • Official Journal of the European Union. (2006). Key competences for Lifelong Learning. European Reference Framework. Brussels: European Parliament and of the Council. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/site/es/oj/2006/l_394/l_ 39420061230es00100018.pdf
  • Pinto Molina M. Cordón J. A. Díaz R. G. (2010). Thirty years of information literacy (1977-2007): A terminological, conceptual and statistical analysis.Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, 17.
  • Price R. Becker K. Clark L. Collins S. (2011). Embedding information literacy in a first-year business undergraduate course.Studies in Higher Education, 36(6), 705–718. 10.1080/03075071003725350
  • Rodríguez Conde M. J. Olmos Migueláñez S. Martínez Abad F. (2013). Evaluación de competencias informacionales en educación secundaria: Un modelo causal.Cultura y Educación, 25(3), 361–373. 10.1174/113564013807749687
  • UNESCO. (2015). Keystones to foster inclusive knowledge societies: Access to information and knowledge, freedom of expression, privacy, and ethics on a global internet. París: UNESCO. Retrieved from http://apo.org.au/node/55441
  • Valimaa J. Hoffman D. (2008). Knowledge society discourse and higher education.Higher Education: The International Journal of Higher Education and Educational Planning, 56(3), 265–285. 10.1007/s10734-008-9123-7
  • Wagner D. A. (1998). Alfabetización: construir el futuro. Paris: UNESCO.
  • Weber G. (1971). Inner-city children can be taught to read: four successful schools. Washington, DC: Council for Basic Education.
  • Yıldırım S. (2012). Teacher Support, Motivation, Learning Strategy Use, and Achievement: A Multilevel Mediation Model.Journal of Experimental Education, 80(2), 150–172. 10.1080/00220973.2011.596855
  • Zelder, N. (2009). Infoglut: Its the disease of the new millennium. How do we treat it? IEEE Spectrum, 46(10), 30-32, 52.