Impact of climate on a bike-sharing system. Minutes of use depending on day of the week, month and season of the year

  1. Sanmiguel-Rodríguez, Alberto 1
  2. Arufe Giráldez, Víctor 2
  1. 1 Universidade de Vigo
    info

    Universidade de Vigo

    Vigo, España

    ROR https://ror.org/05rdf8595

  2. 2 Universidade da Coruña
    info

    Universidade da Coruña

    La Coruña, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01qckj285

Zeitschrift:
Cuadernos de psicología del deporte

ISSN: 1578-8423 1989-5879

Datum der Publikation: 2019

Ausgabe: 19

Nummer: 2

Seiten: 102-112

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.6018/CPD.338441 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: Cuadernos de psicología del deporte

Ziele für nachhaltige Entwicklung

Zusammenfassung

Nos últimos anos, proliferaram políticas municipais socioesportivas destinadas a promover o uso partilhado de bicicletas em diferentes localidades da Espanha. O objetivo deste artigo é, por um lado, saber se o impacto do clima, temperaturas e precipitações médias influenci a o uso de bicicletas partilhadas. E, por outro lado, analisar se o uso dessas bicicletas é afetado, dependendo dos dias da semana, meses e estações do ano. Para este propósito, um estudo descritivo e transversal foi realizado ao longo de 3 anos, registran do os usos de bicicletas partilhadas oferecidas em um município espanhol. Os resultados indicam que não foram encontradas grandes diferenças no uso em relação aos 7 dias da semana. Com relação aos meses, os dados evidenciaram um aumento progressivo no uso do mês de abril para julho, atingindo um pico de 15,6% e 15,8% nos meses de agosto e setembro, respectivamente. Também foram obtidos resultados ligados a variáveis meteorológicas, concluindo que temperaturas amenas e chuvas escassas estão associadas a um maior número de usos do sistema.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Anaya, E. & Castro, A. (2012). Balance general de la bicicleta pública en España. Fundación ECA Bureau Veritas.
  • Arufe, V., Cortés, L. & Alcides, X. (2013) Estudio descriptivo de los servicios ofrecidos para los usuarios de parques biosaludables de Galicia. Retos: nuevas tendencias en educación física, deporte y recreación, 24, 60-62.
  • Börjesson, M. & Eliasson, J. (2012). The value of time and external benefits in bicycle appraisal. Transportation Research Part A: policy and practice, 46(4), 673-683. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2012.01.006
  • Cao, X. J., Mokhtarian, P. L. & Handy, S. L. (2009). The relationship between the built environment and nonwork travel: A case study of Northern California. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 43(5), 548-559. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2009.02.001
  • Castillo-Manzano, J. I. & Sánchez-Braza, A. (2013). Managing a smart bicycle system when demand outstrips supply: the case of the university community in Seville. Transportation, 40(2), 459-477. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116012-9424-7
  • Caulfield, B., O'Mahony, M., Brazil, W. & Weldon, P. (2017). Examining usage patterns of a bike-sharing scheme in a medium sized city. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice 100, 152-161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.04.023
  • Cavill, N. & Rutter, H. (2010). London cycle hire scheme: will it do more harm than good?. Student BMJ, 18, C5621.
  • Dekoster, J. & Schollaert, U. (2000). En bici, hacia ciudades sin malos humos. Oficina de Publicaciones Oficiales de las Comunidades Europeas.
  • DeMaio, P. (2009). Bike-sharing: History, impacts, models of provision, and future. Journal of Public Transportation, 12(4), 41-56. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.12.4.3
  • DeMaio, P. & Gifford, J. (2004). Will smart bikes succeed as public transportation in the United States? Journal of Public Transportation, 7(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.5038/23750901.7.2.1
  • El-Assi, W., Mahmoud, M. S. & Habib, K. N. (2017). Effects of built environment and weather on bike sharing demand: a station level analysis of commercial bike sharing in Toronto. Transportation 44(3), 589–613. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9669-z
  • Faghih-Imani A., Eluru, N., El-Geneidy, A., Rabbat, M. & Haq, U. (2014). How does landuse and urban form impact bicycle flows: Evidence from the bicycle-sharing system (BIXI) in Montreal. Journal of Transport Geography 41, 306-314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.01.013
  • Froehlich, J., Neumann, J. & Oliver, N. (2009, Julio). Sensing and predicting the pulse of the city through shared bicycling. In: 21st International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI) (pp. 1420-1426).
  • Fuller, D., Sahlqvist, S., Cummins, S. & Ogilvie, D. (2012). The impact of public transportation strikes on use of a bicycle share program in London: Interrupted time series design. Preventive Medicine, 54(1), 74-76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2011.09.021
  • Gebhart, K. & Noland, R. B. (2014). The impact of weather conditions on bikeshare trips in Washington, DC. Transportation 41(6), 1205– 1225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9540-7
  • Heinen, E., van Wee, B. & Maat, K. (2010). Bicycle use for commuting: a literature review. Transport Reviews, 30(1), 105-132. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640903187001
  • Lathia, N., Ahmed, S. & Capra, L. (2012). Measuring the impact of opening the London shared bicycle scheme to casual users. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 22, 88-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2011.12.004
  • Martens, K. (2007). Promoting bike-and-ride: The Dutch experience. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 41(4), 326-338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2006.09.010
  • Meteogalicia digital. Consultada el 2 de marzo en: http://meteogalicia.es
  • Midgley, P. (2009). The role of smart bikesharing systems in urban mobility. JOURNEYS, 2, 23-31.
  • Noland, R. B. & Ishaque, M. M. (2006). Smart bicycles in an urban area: evaluation of a pilot scheme in London. Journal of Public Transportation, 9(5), 71-95. https://doi.org/10.5038/2375-0901.9.5.5
  • Ogilvie, F. & Goodman, A. (2012). Inequalities in usage of a public bicycle sharing scheme: Socio-demographic predictors of uptake and usage of the London (UK) cycle hire scheme. Preventive Medicine, 55(1), 40-45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.05.002
  • Pucher, J. & Buehler, R. (2006). Why Canadians cycle more than Americans: a comparative analysis of bicycling trends and policies. Transport Policy, 13(3), 265-279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.11.001
  • Pucher, J., Buehler, R. & Seinen, M. (2011). Bicycling renaissance in North America? An update and re-appraisal of cycling trends and policies. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45(6), 451-475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.03.001
  • Pucher, J., Garrard, J. & Greaves, S. (2011). Cycling down under: a comparative analysis of bicycling trends and policies in Sydney and Melbourne. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(2), 332-345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.02.007
  • Pucher, J., Komanoff, C. & Schimek, P. (1999). Bicycling renaissance in North America? Recent trends and alternative policies to promote bicycling. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 33(7), 625-654. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00010-5
  • Rietveld, P. & Daniel, V. (2004). Determinants of bicycle use: Do municipal policies matter?. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 38(7), 531-550. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2004.05.003
  • Rojas-Rueda, D., de Nazelle, A., Tainio, M. & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J. (2011). The health risks and benefits of cycling in urban environments compared with car use: health impact assessment study. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 343(7819), 356. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d4521
  • Saneinejad, S., Roorda, M. J. & Kennedy, C. (2012). Modelling the impact of weather conditions on active transportation travel behaviour. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 17(2), 129-137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2011.09.005
  • Sanmiguel, A. (2015). Ambiente urbano y bicicletas compartidas: efectos sobre la actividad física (Tesis doctoral). Universidad de Vigo (España)
  • Sanmiguel, A. (2019). Análisis de las edades, trayectos y minutos de uso en la utilización de un sistema de bicicletas compartidas: el caso del VaiBike en Vilagarcía de Arousa (España). Retos. Nuevas Tendencias en Educación Física, Deporte y Recreación, 35, 314-319.
  • Sun, F., Chen, P. & Jiao, J. (2018). Promoting public bike-sharing: A lesson from the unsuccessful Pronto system. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 63, 533-547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.06.021
  • Tin, S. T., Woodward, A., Robinson, E. & Ameratunga, S. (2012). Temporal, seasonal and weather effects on cycle volume: an ecological study. Environmental Health, 11(12), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/1476-069X-11-12
  • Tin, S. T., Woodward, A., Thornley, S., Langley, J., Rodgers, A. & Ameratunga, S. (2010). Cyclists’ attitudes toward policies encouraging bicycle travel: findings from the Taupo Bicycle Study in New Zealand. Health Promotion International, 25(1), 54-62. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapro/dap041
  • Vogel, P. & Mattfeld, D. C. (2010, Julio). Modeling of repositioning activities in bikesharing systems. In World Conference on Transport Research (WCTR).
  • Winters, M., Friesen, M. C., Koehoorn, M. & Teschke, K. (2007). Utilitarian bicycling a multilevel analysis of climate and personal influences. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 32(1), 52-58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2006.08.027
  • Yang, L., Sahlqvist, S., McMinn, A., Griffin, S. J. & Ogilvie, D. (2010). Interventions to promote cycling: systematic review. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 341. c5293–c5310 https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.c5293