Impact on Spanish women of previous workplace victimization experiences of workplace sexual harassment on the responsibility to intervene as bystandermediating roles of myth acceptance and perceived severity

  1. Andrés Sánchez-Prada 1
  2. Virginia Ferreiro-Basurto 2
  3. Carmen Delgado-Álvarez 1
  4. Leila I. Vázquez-González 2
  5. Ainara Nardi-Rodríguez 3
  6. Victoria A. Ferrer-Perez 2
  1. 1 Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad Pontificia de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02jj93564

  2. 2 Universitat de les Illes Balears
    info

    Universitat de les Illes Balears

    Palma, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03e10x626

  3. 3 Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche
    info

    Universidad Miguel Hernández de Elche

    Elche, España

    ROR https://ror.org/01azzms13

Zeitschrift:
International journal of clinical and health psychology

ISSN: 1697-2600

Datum der Publikation: 2024

Ausgabe: 24

Nummer: 3

Seiten: 221-230

Art: Artikel

DOI: 10.1016/J.IJCHP.2024.100497 DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openOpen Access editor

Andere Publikationen in: International journal of clinical and health psychology

Zusammenfassung

Background Bystander behaviors can be an important key for preventing all forms of violence against women. Identifying their facilitators and barriers becomes a priority. The aim of this research is to analyze the impact of the previous experiences of women (as sexual harassment victim or bystander) on their perceived responsibility to intervene as bystander in a case of workplace sexual harassment and to determine the possible mediating role of certain attitudinal and evaluative factors. Method A non-probability convenience sample of 633 Spanish women answered a sociodemographic data questionnaire, a victimization questionnaire designed ad hoc, and the Questionnaire of Intention to Help in VAW Cases. Results The results obtained indicate that previous victimization experiences as a victim or witness of sexual harassment impact the responsibility to intervene, mediated by the acceptance of sexual harassment myths and the perceived severity of workplace sexual harassment. Conclusions These results may help to understand how to design prevention programs and which key variables to incorporate.

Bibliographische Referenzen

  • Anon. CEDAW (1992). General recommendation N◦ 19. https://www.un.org/womenwat ch/daw/cedaw/recommendations/recomm.htm.
  • Anon, & GOGBV (Government Office for Gender-Based Violence).. (2018). The social perception of sexual violence. government office for gender-based violence. https://violen ciagenero.igualdad.gob.es/violenciaEnCifras/estudios/colecciones/pdf/Libro_25_Violencia_Sexual_English.pdf.
  • Anon, & GOGBV (Government Office for Gender-Based Violence).. (2022a). State strategy to combat male violence 2022-2025 (EEVM). Government Office for Gender-Based Violence. https://violenciagenero.igualdad.gob.es/planActuacion/estrategiasEstata les/combatirViolenciaMachista/estrategia_2022_2025.htm.
  • Anon, & GOGBV (Government Office for Gender-Based Violence).. (2022b). European survey on gender-based violence 2022. Government Office for Gender-Based Violence. https://violenciagenero.igualdad.gob.es/violenciaEnCifras/Encuesta_Europea/home.htm.
  • Arbeit, M. R. (2018). They’re hoping we can stop it”: Student leadership in sexual violence intervention and response at West Point. Journal of Community Psychology, 46(5), 598–615. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.21961
  • Badenes-Sastre, M., Lorente, M., & Exposito, F. (2023). Future health-professionals: Attitudes, perceived severity, and willingness to intervene in intimate partner violence cases. Revista Iberoamericana de Psicología y Salud, 14(1), 10–17. https:// doi.org/10.23923/j.rips.2023.01.061
  • Banyard, V. L. (2011). Who will help prevent sexual violence: Creating an ecological model of bystander intervention. Psychology of Violence, 1(3), 216–229. https://doi. org/10.1037/a0023739
  • Banyard, V. L., & Moynihan, M. M. (2011). Variation in bystander behavior related to sexual and intimate partner violence prevention: Correlates in a sample of college students. Psychology of Violence, 1, 287–301. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023544
  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.
  • Bennett, S., Banyard, V. L., & Garnhart, L. (2014). To act or not to act, that is the question? Barriers and facilitators of bystander intervention. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 29(3), 476–496. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260513505210
  • Berdahl, J. L. (2007). The sexual harassment of uppity women. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 425–437.
  • Bohner, G., Weiss, A., Schirch, C., Zollner, L., Lipinska, A., Sempere, M. J., & Megías, J. L. (2022). AMMSA-21: A revised version of the acceptance of modern myths about sexual aggression scale in English, German, polish and Spanish. International Journal of Social Psychology, 37(3), 460–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/02134748.2022.2083291
  • Brewer, G., Burnham, C., Drysdale, S., Katsouris, A., Mosey, E., & Lyons, M. (2024). Bystander barriers in sexual harassment—Associations with the Dark Triad and social anxiety. Personality and Individual Differences, 217, 1–4. https://doi.org/ 10.1016/j.paid.2023.112446
  • Burn, S. M. (2009). A situational model of sexual assault prevention through bystander intervention. Sex roles, 60(11), 779–792. https://doi.org/10.10007/s11199-008-9581-5
  • Campbell, J., & McFadyen, M. A. (2017). Sexual harassment: Have we made any progress? Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 286–298. https://doi. org/10.1037/ocp0000054
  • Casey, E. A., Lindhorst, T., & Storer, H. L. (2017). The situational-cognitive model of adolescent bystander behavior: Modeling bystander decision-making in the context of bullying and teen dating violence. Psychology of Violence, 11(1), 33–44. https:// doi.org/10.1037/vio0000033
  • Darley, J. M., & Latane, B. (1968). Bystander intervention in emergencies: Diffusion of responsibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(4), 377–383. https:// doi.org/10.1037/h0025589
  • Exposito, F., Herrera, A., Valor-Segura, I., Herrera, M. C., & Lozano, L. M. (2014). Spanish adaptation of the illinois sexual harassment myth acceptance. Spanish Journal of Psychology, 17, E40. https://doi.org/10.1017/sjp.2014.42
  • Ferrer-Perez, V. A., Sanchez-Prada, A., Bosch-Fiol, E., Delgado-Alvarez, C., Vazquez- Gonzalez, L. I., & Nardi-Rodriguez, A. (2023). The Questionnaire of Intention to Help in VAW Cases (QIHVC): Development and preliminary results. Frontiers in Psychology, 14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1153678
  • Fitzgerald, L. F., & Cortina, L. M. (2018). Sexual harassment in work organizations: A view from the 21st century. In C. B Travis, J. W. White, A. Rutherford, W. S. Williams, S. L. Cook, & K. F. Wyche (Eds.), APA handbook of the psychology of women: Perspectives on women’s private and public lives (pp. 215–234). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000060-012.
  • Gidycz, C. A., Mcnamara, J. R., & Edwards, K. M. (2006). Womens risk perception and sexual victimization: A review of the literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11 (5), 441–456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2006.01.004
  • Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.
  • Hoxmeier, J. C., McMahon, S., & O’Connor, J (2020). Beyond yes or no: Understanding undergraduate students’ responses as bystanders to sexual assault risk situations. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(23–24), 5772–5796. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 0886260517723143
  • Ilies, R., Hauserman, N., Schowochau, S., & Stibal, J. (2006). Reported incidence rates of work-related sexual harassment in the United States: Using meta-analysis to explain reported rate disparities. Personnel Psychology, 56, 607–663. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2003.tb00752.x
  • Jacobson, R. K., & Eaton, A. A. (2018). How organizational policies influence bystander likelihood of reporting moderate and severe sexual harassment at work. Employee Responsibilities and Rights Journal, 30(1), 37–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10672- 017-9309-1
  • Kania, R., & Cale, J. (2021). Preventing sexual violence through bystander intervention: Attitudes, behaviors, missed opportunities, and barriers to intervention among Australian university students. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(5–6), 2816–2840. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518764395
  • Katz, J. (2015). Effects of group status and victim sex on male bystanders’ responses to a potential party rape. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 24(5), 588–602. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2015.1029184
  • Katz, J., Colbert, S., & Colangelo, L. (2015). Effects of group status and victim sex on female bystanders’ responses to a potential party rape. Violence and Victims, 30(2), 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-13-00099
  • Kettrey, H. H., & Marx, R. A. (2021). Effects of bystander sexual assault prevention programs on promoting intervention skills and combatting the bystander effect: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 17(3), 343–367. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-020-09417-y
  • Kistler, T., Stuart, G. L., & Cornelius, T. L. (2022). Barriers to bystander interventions for sexual assault: Impact of personal history of sexual victimization. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(17–18), NP16727–NP16749. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 08862605211023491
  • Labhardt, D., Holdsworth, E., Brown, S., & Howat, D. (2017). You see but you do not observe: A review of bystander intervention and sexual assault on university campuses. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 35, 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. avb.2017.05.005
  • Lamb, S., & Attwell, L. (2019). Bystanders in ‘sketchy’ sexual situations: Their constructions of the ‘girl,’ the ‘guy,’ and themselves. Feminism & Psychology, 29(3), 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1177/0959353518821150
  • Latane, B., & Darley, J. M (1970). The unresponsive bystander: Why doesn’t he help? Appleton-Century-Crofts.
  • Lee, S. Y., Hanson, M. D., & Cheung, H. K. (2019). Incorporating bystander intervention into sexual harassment training. Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Perspectives on Science and Practice, 12(1), 52–57. https://doi.org/10.1017/ iop.2019.8
  • Leon, C. M., Aizpurua, E., & Rollero, C. (2022). None of my business? An experiment analyzing willingness to formally report incidents of intimate partner violence against women. Violence against women, 28(9), 2163–2185. https://doi.org/ 10.1177/10778012211025990
  • Leone, R. M., Oyler, K. N., & Parrott, D. J. (2020). Empathy is not enough: The inhibiting effects of rape myth acceptance on the relation between empathy and bystander intervention. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 36(23–24), 11532–11552. https://doi. org/10.1177/0886260519900328
  • Lonsway, K. A., Cortina, L. M., & Magley, V. J. (2008). Sexual harassment mythology: Definition, conceptualization, and measurement. Sex roles, 58, 599–615. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11199-007-9367-1
  • Lyons, M., Brewer, G., Bogle, I., Castro Caicedo, J., Gaspar, M., Ghayda, C., Huelin, M., Liang, T. W., & Centifanti, L. (2022a). Barriers to bystander intervention in sexual harassment: The dark triad and rape myth acceptance in Indonesia, Singapore, and United Kingdom. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 37(23–24). https://doi.org/ 10.1177/08862605211072150
  • Lyons, M., Brewer, G., Castro Caicedo, J., Andrade, M., Morales, M., & Centifanti, L. (2022b). Barriers to sexual harassment bystander intervention in Ecuadorian universities. Global Public Health, 17(6), 1029–1040. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 17441692.2021.1884278
  • Lyons, M., Brewer, G., Chopen, N., Davilas, N., Elías, D., Danilova, L., Gomez, R., Velasquez, J., & García, G. (2024). Barriers to bystander action in sexual violence in Guatemala: The role of rape myth acceptance. Sexuality & Culture, 28, 155–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-023-10106-x
  • Mainwaring, C., Gabbert, F., & Scott, A. J. (2023). A systematic review exploring variables related to bystander intervention in sexual violence contexts. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 24(3), 1727–1742. https://doi.org/10.1177/15248380221079660
  • Martínez-Fernandez, M., Marco, M., Castro, A., Gracia, A., & Lila, M. (2021). Predicting the willingness to intervene in cases of intimate partner violence A mediation analysis. In Proceedings of the 9th European Congress of Methodology. Available at. Htt ps://www.academia.edu/85435468/Proceedings_from_the_9th_European_Congre ss_of_Methodology.
  • Martini, M., & De Piccoli, N. (2020). Predicting bystander intention to intervene: The role of gender-specific system justification and rape myth acceptance for men and women. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 326. https://doi.org/10.3380/fpsyg.2020.00326
  • McDonald, P. (2012). Workplace sexual harassment 30 years on: A review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14, 1–17. https://doi.org/ 10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00300.x
  • McDonald, P., Charlesworth, S., & Graham, T. (2016). Action or inaction: Bystander intervention in workplace sexual harassment. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 27, 548–566. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585192.2015.1023331
  • McMahon, S., & Banyard, V. L. (2012). When can I help? A conceptual framework for the prevention of sexual violence through bystander intervention. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 13, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838011426015
  • Megías, J. L., Romero-Sanchez, M., Duran, M., Moya, M., & Bohner, G. (2011). Spanish validation of the Acceptance of Modern Myths about Sexual Aggression Scale (AMMSA). The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 14(2), 912–925. https://doi.org/ 10.5209/rev_SJOP.2011.v14.n2.37
  • Mujal, G. N., Taylor, M. E., Fry, J. L., Gochez-Kerr, T. H., & Weaver, N. L. (2021). A systematic review of bystander interventions for the prevention of sexual violence. Trauma Violence & Abuse, 22(2), 381–396. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 1524838019849587
  • Oesterle, D. W., Orchowski, L. M., Moreno, O., & Berkowitz, A. (2018). A qualitative analysis of bystander intervention among heavy-drinking college men. Violence against women, 24(10), 1207–1231. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218781931
  • Park, S., & Kim, S.-H. (2023). A systematic review and meta-analysis of bystander intervention programs for intimate partner violence and sexual assault. Psychology of Violence, 13(2), 93–106. https://doi.org/10.1037/vio0000456
  • Pina, A., Gannon, T. A., & Saunders, B. (2009). An overview of the literature on sexual harassment: Perpetrator, theory, and treatment issues. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14(2), 126–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avb.2009.01.002
  • Reynolds-Tylus, T., Lukacena, K. M., & Quick, B. L. (2019). An application of the theory of normative social behavior to bystander intervention for sexual assault. Journal of American College Health, 67(6), 551–559. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2018.1499648
  • Robinson, S. R., Casiano, A., & Elias-Lambert, N. (2020). Is It my responsibility?”: A qualitative review of university students’ perspectives on bystander behavior. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 23(1), 117–131. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 152483802093382
  • Sardinha, L., Maheu-Giroux, M., Sto¨ckl, H., Meyer, S. R., & García-Moreno, C. (2022). Global, regional, and national prevalence estimates of physical or sexual, or both, intimate partner violence against women in 2018. Lancet (London, England), 399 (10327), 803–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02664-7
  • Serrano-Montilla, C., Garrido-Macías, M., Saez-Díaz, J., & Saez, G. (2023). Assessing police attitudes toward intervention in gender violence: The role of training, perceived severity, and myths about intimate partner violence against women. Journal of Family Violence. First published on line.. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896- 023-00605-8
  • Woods, W. C., Shorey, R. C., Strauss, C. V., Cornelius, T. L., & Rowland, T. (2016). The relationship between dating violence and bystander behavior: An initial investigation. Partner abuse, 7, 55–69. https://doi.org/10.1891/1946-6560.7.1.55
  • Yule, K., & Grych, J. (2020). College students’ perceptions of barriers to bystander intervention. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(15–16), 2971–2992. https://doi. org/10.1177/0886260517706764
  • Zelin, A. I., Walker, R. V., & Johnson, D. M. (2019). Cornered at a bar: How victim clothing, alcohol intake, and relationship with bystander impact intention to help. Violence against women, 25(10), 1163–1190. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801218809948