Aprendizaje activo y competencias socioemocionales en entornos digitales de educación superior

  1. Alé-Ruiz, Rafael 1
  2. del Moral Marcos, Maria Teresa 2
  1. 1 Universidad Francisco de Vitoria
    info

    Universidad Francisco de Vitoria

    Pozuelo de Alarcón, España

    ROR https://ror.org/03ha64j07

  2. 2 Universidad de Salamanca
    info

    Universidad de Salamanca

    Salamanca, España

    ROR https://ror.org/02f40zc51

Revista:
UTE Teaching & Technology: Universitas Tarraconensis

ISSN: 1135-1438,  2385-4731

Año de publicación: 2021

Título del ejemplar: Monogràfic

Número: 1

Páginas: 30-49

Tipo: Artículo

DIALNET GOOGLE SCHOLAR lock_openAcceso abierto editor

Otras publicaciones en: UTE Teaching & Technology: Universitas Tarraconensis

Resumen

Education, and more specifically higher education, plays an essential role in the development of skills that allow students to fully integrate into society, as stated by the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD, 2019), and in ensuring adherence to social principles such as accessibility, equity, diversity, and inclusion (EHEA, 2020). The objective is to present a teaching management tool, the result of five years of work, whose aim is to assist both students and teachers in the learning-teaching process. As an example, the practical application of the tool to the leadership competence is shown. This is a teaching innovation project, with a mixed approach, in which a pre-experimental study is carried out without a control group. Set amidst a digital ecosystem with active learning methodologies, a set of software elements has been defined, designed, interconnected, and implemented focusing on providing a modular and scalable teaching innovation tool that improves the quality of the learning-teaching process. As an example of its applicability, this article presents the analysis of recorded data obtained from the direct observation of high-performance work teams created for 245 students from the Faculty of Law, Business and Governance of the Francisco de Vitoria University, between 2018-2020. The tool facilitates communication with the student, feedback on their learning and its personalization, while at the same time assisting the teacher in the planning, implementation, and governance of their teaching.

Referencias bibliográficas

  • Aguilar-Bustamante, M. C., & Correa-Chica, A. (2017). Análisis de las variables asociadas al estudio del liderazgo: una revisión sistemática de la literatura. Universitas Psychologica, 16(1). https://doi.org/10.11144/Javeriana.upsy16-1.avae
  • Alé-Ruiz, R., & Earle, D. H. (2020). Una herramienta para la gestión y el gobierno integrales del aprehendizaje universitario en entornos Active Learning. Revista Interuniversitaria de Formación Del Profesorado. Continuación de La Antigua Revista de Escuelas Normales, 34(2), 37–60. https://doi.org/10.47553/rifop.v34i2.77913
  • Amaya, A., Cantú Cervantes, D., & Marreros Vázquez, J. G. (2021). Análisis de las competencias didácticas virtuales en la impartición de clases universitarias en línea, durante contingencia del COVID-19. Revista de Educación a Distancia (RED), 21(65), 20. https://doi.org/10.6018/red.426371
  • Amhag, L., Hellström, L., & Stigmar, M. (2019). Teacher Educators’ Use of Digital Tools and Needs for Digital Competence in Higher Education. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education, 35(4), 203–220. https://doi.org/10.1080/21532974.2019.1646169
  • Bakhshi, H., Downing, J. M., Osborne, M. A., & Schneider, P. (2017). The Future Skills: Employment in 2030. Pearson. https://futureskills.pearson.com/research/assets/pdfs/ technical-report.pdf
  • Barak, M. & Shiran, Y. (2021). A cultural perspective to project-based learning and the cultivation of innovative thinking. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 39, 100766. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.tsc.2020.100766
  • Baumann, T., Mantay, K., Swanger, A., Saganski, G., & Stepke, S. (2016). Education and Innovation Management: A Contradiction? How to Manage Educational Projects if Innovation is Crucial for Success and Innovation Management is Mostly Unknown. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 226, 243–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. sbspro.2016.06.185
  • Benito, H., Llop, E., Verdaguer, M., Comas, J., Lleonart, A., Orts, M., Amadó, A., & Rostan, C. (2021). Multidimensional research on university engagement using a mixed method approach. Educación XX1, 24(2), 65–96. https://doi.org/10.5944/educxx1.28561
  • Bisquerra, R. y Pérez, N. (2007). Las competencias emocionales. Educación XX1, 10, 61- 82.
  • Bonami, B., Piazentini, L., & Dala-Possa, A. (2020). Education, Big Data and Artificial Intelligence: Mixed methods in digital platforms. Comunicar, 28(65), 43–52. https://doi. org/10.3916/C65-2020-04
  • Boyatzis, R. E. & Ratti, F. (2009). Emotional, social and cognitive intelligence competencies distinguishing effective Italian managers and leaders in a private company and cooperatives. Journal of Management. Development, 28(9), 821–838. https://doi. org/10.1108/02621710910987674
  • Boyatzis, R. E., & Cavanagh, K. V. (2018). Leading change: Developing emotional, social, and cognitive competencies in managers during an MBA program. In K. V. Keefer, J. D. A. Parker, & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), Emotional intelligence in education: Integrating research with practice (pp. 403–426). Springer International Publishing. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-319-90633-1_15
  • Brandenburg, U., de Wit, H., Jones, E., Leask, B., & Drobner, A. (2020). Internationalisation in Higher Education for Society (IHES). Concept, current research and examples of good practice. https://static.daad.de/media/daad_de/pdfs_nicht_barrierefrei/der-daad/ analysen-studien/daad_s15_studien_ihes_web.pdf
  • Cheung, S. K. S., Wang, F. L., Kwok, L. F., & Poulova, P. (2021). In search of the good practices of personalized learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(2), 179–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1894830
  • Chipchase, L., Davidson, M., Blackstock, F., Bye, R., Colthier, P., Krupp, N., Dickson, W., Turner, D., & Williams, M. (2017). Conceptualising and Measuring Student Disengagement in Higher Education: A Synthesis of the Literature. International Journal of Higher Education, 6(2), 31. https://doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v6n2p31
  • Christenson, S. L., Wylie, C., & Reschly, A. L. (2012). Handbook of Research on Student Engagement. Handbook of Research on Student Engagement, 1–840. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7
  • Collie, R. J., Holliman, A. J., & Martin, A. J. (2017). Adaptability, engagement, and academic achievement at university. Educational Psychology, 37(5), 632–647. https://doi.org/10. 1080/01443410.2016.1231296
  • Crespí, P. & García-Ramos, J.M. (2021). Generic skills at university. Evaluation of a training program. Educación XX1, 24(1), 297-327. http://doi.org/10.5944/educXX1.26846
  • Crisol-Moya, E., Romero-López, M. A., & Caurcel-Cara, M. J. (2020). Active Methodologies in Higher Education: Perception and Opinion as Evaluated by Professors and Their Students in the Teaching-Learning Process. Frontiers in Psychology, 11(August), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01703
  • Damewood, A. M. (2016). Current Trends in Higher Education Technology: Simulation. TechTrends, 60(3), 268–271. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-016-0048-1
  • Dascalu, M. I., Tesila, B., & Nedelcu, R. A. (2016). Enhancing employability through e-learning communities: From myth to reality. State of the Art and Future Directions of Smart Learning, 9789812878663, 309–313. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-868-7_38
  • Delors, J. (1996). Los cuatro pilares de la educación. En La educación encierra un tesoro. Informe a la UNESCO de la Comisión internacional sobre la educación para el siglo XXI (pp. 91-103). Santillana/UNESCO.
  • European Commission. (2013). High Level Group on the Modernisation of Higher Education. In Report to the European Commission on Improving the quality of teaching and learning in Europe’s higher education institutions: Vol. High Level (Issue June).
  • European Commission. (2014). Modernisation of Higher Education (Issue June). https:// www.academia.edu/6770461/Improving_the_quality_of_teaching_and_learning_in_ Europes_higher_education_institutions_High_Level_Group_on_the_Modernisation_ of_Higher_Education_An_initiative_of_the
  • European Commission (2015). The changing pedagogical landscape. New ways of teaching and learning and their implications for higher education policy. https://doi. org/10.2766/72063
  • European Higher Education Area (EHEA) (2020). Advisory Group 1 on Social Dimension. Final Report. https://ehea2020rome.it/storage/uploads/0479534b-a889-4fd9-9d15- 64b49e6ee768/AG1_Social_Dimension_Final_Report.pdf
  • Farrell, O., & Brunton, J. (2020). A balancing act: a window into online student engagement experiences. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00199-x
  • Fidalgo Blanco, Á., Sein-Echaluce Lacleta, M. L., García-Peñalvo, F. J., & Balbín Bastidas, A. M. (2019). Método para diseñar buenas prácticas de innovación educativa docente: percepción del profesorado. Aprendizaje, Innovación y Cooperación Como Impulsores Del Cambio Metodológico, 623–628. https://doi.org/10.26754/CINAIC.2019.0127
  • García Delgado, C. y Del Moral, M.T. (2021). ABP emocional para mejorar la satisfacción con el aprendizaje y la prevención de los conflictos escolares. En A. S. Jiménez, M. Vergara, E.M. Rainha, M.A. Martín y J. Cáceres (Coord.), Construyendo juntos una escuela para la vida (pp.190-197). Dykinson.
  • Gervais, J. (2016). The operational definition of competency-based education. The Journal of Competency-Based Education, 1(2), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbe2.1011
  • Goh, C. F., Hii, P. K., Tan, O. K., & Rasli, A. (2020). Why do University teachers use e-learning systems? International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 21(2), 136–155. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v21i2.3720
  • Goleman, D. (2019). The emotionally intelligent leader. Harvard Business Press.
  • Goleman, D., & Boyatzis, R. (2017). Emotional intelligence has 12 elements. Which do you need to work on? Harvard Business Review, 84(2), 1-5.
  • Goleman, D., Boyatzis, R. & McKee, A. (2013). Primal Leadership: Unleashing the Power of Emotional Intelligence. Harvard Business Press.
  • Groff, J. S. (2017). The State of the Field & Future Directions (Issue April). https://dam-prod. media.mit.edu/x/2017/04/26/PersonalizedLearning_CCR_April2017.pdf
  • Gros, B. (2016). The design of smart educational environments. Smart Learning Environments, 3(1), 15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-016-0039-x
  • Guàrdia, L., Clougher, D., Anderson, T., & Maina, M. (2021). IDEAS for Transforming Higher Education: An Overview of Ongoing Trends and Challenges. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(2), 166–184. https://doi. org/10.19173/irrodl.v22i2.5206
  • Hwang, G. J. (2014). Definition, framework and research issues of smart learning environments a context-aware ubiquitous learning perspective. Smart Learning Environments, 1(1), 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-014-0004-5
  • Hwang, J. H., & Choi, H. J. (2016). Influence of Smart Devices on the Cognition and Interest of Underprivileged Students in Smart Education. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 9(44). https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2016/v9i44/105171
  • Johnson, N., Veletsianos, G., & Seaman, J. (2020). U.S. Faculty and Administrators’ Experiences and Approaches in the Early Weeks of the COVID-19 Pandemic. Online Learning, 24(2), 6–21. https://doi.org/10.24059/olj.v24i2.2285
  • Kahu, E. R., & Nelson, K. (2018). Student engagement in the educational interface: Understanding the mechanisms of student success. Higher Education Research & Development, 37(6), 1260–1273. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2018.1478803
  • Kaiser, R. B., & Overfield, D. V. (2010). The leadership value chain. The PsychologistManager Journal, 13(3), 164–183. https://doi.org/10.1080/10887156.2010.500261
  • Lee, D., Huh, Y., Lin, C. Y., & Reigeluth, C. M. (2018). Technology functions for personalized learning in learner-centered schools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 66(5), 1269–1302. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-018-9615-9
  • Li, K. C., & Wong, B. T. M. (2020). The use of student response systems with learning analytics: A review of case studies (2008-2017). In International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation (Vol. 14, Issue 1, pp. 63–79). https://doi.org/10.1504/ IJMLO.2020.103901
  • Li, K. C., & Wong, B. T. M. (2021a). Review of smart learning: Patterns and trends in research and practice. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 37(2), 189–204. https:// doi.org/10.14742/ajet.6617
  • Li, K. C., & Wong, B. T. M. (2021b). Features and trends of personalised learning: a review of journal publications from 2001 to 2018. Interactive Learning Environments, 29(2), 182–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2020.1811735
  • Miller, A. (2019). 3 Myths of Personalized Learning | Edutopia. https://www.edutopia.org/ article/3-myths-personalized-learning
  • Ministerio de Educación y Cultura de España. (2006). Propuestas para la Renovación de las Metodologías Educativas en la Universidad. En Secretaría General Técnica del MEC. https://sede.educacion.gob.es/publiventa/propuestas-para-la-renovacion-delas-metodologias-educativas-en-la-universidad/universidad/12114
  • Montalvo-Garcia, A., Martí-Ripoll, M., & Gallifa, J. (2021). Emotional Competence Development in Graduate Education: The Differentiated Impact of a Self-Leadership Program Depending on Personality Traits. Frontiers in Psychology, 21(12), 666455. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.666455
  • Mora, F. (2013). Neuroeducación. Madrid, España: Alianza Editorial.Nigay, L., & Coutaz, J. (1993). A design space for multimodal systems: Concurrent Processing and Data Fusion. 172–178. https://doi.org/10.1145/169059.169143
  • OECD. (2019). OECD Future of Education and Skills 2030: Project background. https:// www.oecd.org/education/2030-project/
  • Palloan, P., Usman, A., & Hakim, A. (2021). E-Learning Integrated Active Learning Strategies to Improve the Critical Thinking Skills. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1899, 012162. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1899/1/012162
  • Pearce, C. L., & Conger, J. A. (2003). Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership Craig L Pearce, Jay A. Conger Google Boeken.
  • Pegalajar, M. C. (2021). Implicaciones de la gamificación en Educación Superior: una revisión sistemática sobre la percepción del estudiante. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 39(1), 169–188. https://doi.org/10.6018/rie.419481
  • Perkmann, M., Salandra, R., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., & Hughes, A. (2021). Academic engagement: A review of the literature 2011-2019. Research Policy, 50(1), 104114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104114
  • Ramírez, S., & Valenzuela, J. (2020). Innovación educativa : tendencias globales de investigación e implicaciones prácticas. Octaedro, Barcelona, España. https:// octaedro.com/libro/innovacion-educativa-tendencias-globales-de-investigacion-eimplicaciones-practicas/
  • Repetto, E. (dir.) (2009). Formación en competencias socioemocionales. La Muralla.
  • Ricchiardi, P., & Emanuel, F. (2018). Soft Skill Assessment in Higher Education. Journal of Educational Cultural and Psychological Studies, 18, 21-53. https://doi.org/10.7358/ ecps-2018-018-ricc
  • Rodríguez-Izquierdo, R. M. (2020). Service learning and academic commitment in higher education. Revista de Psicodidactica, 25(1), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. psicod.2019.09.001
  • Rowe, A. D. (2017). Feelings about feedback: the role of emotions in assessment for learning. In Scaling up assessment for learning in higher education (pp. 159-172). Springer, Singapore.
  • Ruano-Borbalan, J. (2019). Innovation in higher education: Actors, policies and pedagogical effects. European Journal of Education, 54(4), 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/ ejed.12371
  • Sansone, N. & Bortolotti, I. (2021). Technology Enhanced Active and Collaborative Learning in Distance Higher Education: Students’ Perception. Proceedings of the First Workshop on Technology Enhanced Learning Environments for Blended Education. http://ceurws.org/Vol-2817/paper23.pdf
  • Santos, M.A., Mella, I., Naval, C., & Vázquez, V. (2021). The Evaluation of Social and Professional Life Competences of University Students Through Service-Learning. Frontiers in Education, 6, 606304. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2021.606304
  • Silva, A. (2016). What is leadership?. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 8(1), 1-5. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarly-journals/what-is-leadership/ docview/1831706711/se-2
  • Singh, H., & Miah, S. J. (2020). Smart education literature: A theoretical analysis. Education and Information Technologies, 25(4), 3299–3328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-020- 10116-4
  • Thomas, C. L., & Allen, K. (2020). Driving engagement: investigating the influence of emotional intelligence and academic buoyancy on student engagement. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 45(1), 107-119. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1741520
  • Walkington, C., & Bernacki, M. L. (2020). Appraising research on personalized learning: Definitions, theoretical alignment, advancements, and future directions. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 52(3), 235–252. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391 523.2020.1747757
  • Westine, C. D., Oyarzun, B., Ahlgrim-Delzell, L., Casto, A., Okraski, C., Park, G., Person, J., & Steele, L. (2019). Familiarity, Current Use, and Interest in Universal Design for Learning Among Online University Instructors. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 20(5), 20–41. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v20i5.4258
  • Yoo, Y., Lee, H., Jo, I.-H., & Park, Y. (2015). Educational Dashboards for Smart Learning: Review of Case Studies. In Lecture Notes in Educational Technology (Issue 9783662441879, pp. 145–155). Springer International Publishing. https://doi. org/10.1007/978-3-662-44188-6_21
  • Zamora-Polo, F., & Sánchez-Martín, J. (2019). Teaching for a Better World. Sustainability and Sustainable Development Goals in the Construction of a Change-Maker University. Sustainability, 11(15), 4224. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11154224
Fuente de los datos: Dialnet